Benny Paret s Real KillersNo one can deny that rage has become a pervasive part of the American vitality . Violence is everywhere . It is delivered right at home finished cable tv . It is considered a form of entertainment and volume of Americans consume their dose of violence done the news and through their patronage of prizefighting brags such as boxing and wrestling thusly , violence is as much part of the social grace of rich and poor alike , through their promotion and troth in deadly sporting activities some(prenominal) inside and exterior the ringIn the essay Who Killed Benny Paret Norman Cousins delivers a stinging reassessment of society s complicity with the violence and death caused by the immense popularity of prizefighting as a sport . The author notes that the observations of renowned boxing performer Mike Jacobs closely the consumers of prizefighting are in fact authentic and real . People do not line up at boxing and wrestling matches because these sports teach value about endurance or stamina . People go to expect boxing and wrestling bouts because of a more guttural subscribe to to see 2 human beings trading punches that could kill them both . The tragic death of Benny Paret is provided one check of the culture of violence that pervades America and the rest of the worldA young backpacker , Benny Paret went into a coma and never woke out of it after(prenominal) receiving too many punches on his head which caused severe head teacher hemmorhage . The government and the boxing authorities , alarmed by the outcome , launched an investistigation to determine responsibility for Paret s death . This probe involved a probe into the culpability of the fight referree , Paret s manager , and Paret s physical school in causing his early demise .
However , as Cousins argues , the investigation glossed over the real perpetrators of Paret s death : the brutality of the sport itself which exposes its players to the risks of being maimed or killed in the ringOne cannot help but emphatize with Cousins despairing tone regarding the futility of the investigations on Paret s death . The outcome of the investigation itself has already been precluded by the fact that Paret s death is only a sign of a complex , and pervasive social riddle wherein the existence of prizefighting as a form of sport itself is super questionable . In this sense , investigating and trying to bulk the blame on the referee for his perceived negligence is not only unfair , it also worsens the problem . As Cousins justifiedly points out , the referee himself is compelled to perform his duties and responsibilities based on gathering expectations . That is , the referee cannot intrude into the heat of the boxing match because two men are hurting each other : that is what the force pays for to watch in the first placeClearly , a more precise probe into Paret s death should look at the normative values and social standards that perpetuate the existence of boxing and other forms of prizefighting as a form of entertainment...If you want to get a liberal essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .